Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-settings.php on line 512

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-settings.php on line 527

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-settings.php on line 534

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-settings.php on line 570

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-includes/http.php on line 61

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrFrontHelp::detect_bot() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1295

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrFrontHelp::detect_ban() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1296

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrBlgDB::check_ip_single() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/blg/helpers.php on line 90

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrBlgDB::check_ip_range() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/blg/helpers.php on line 92

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrBlgDB::check_ip_mask() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/blg/helpers.php on line 94

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::prefill_zeros() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1709

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::prefill_zeros() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1710

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::prefill_zeros() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1711

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::prefill_zeros() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1712

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::prefill_zeros() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1713

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::prefill_zeros() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1714
Breakup Girl » Sassy and lonely
Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrFrontHelp::ie_opacity_fix() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1415
Home
Advice

Comics

Animation

Goodies

Big To Do
MORE...
About Us

Archive
“Saving Love Lives The World Over!” e-mail e-mail to a friend in need

October 29, 2010

Sassy and lonely

Filed under: Advice — posted by Breakup Girl @ 8:29 am

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdFunctionsGDSR::get_caller_backtrace() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1826

Strict Standards: Non-static method gdsrBlgDB::add_new_view() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1837

Strict Standards: Non-static method GDSRDatabase::get_post_data() should not be called statically in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/cache.php on line 107

BG hits the ice on April 27, 1998

Dear Breakup Girl,

Thank you so much for your web site and especially your advice column. Even when the advice doesn’t directly pertain to my own predicament of the week, I enjoy reading your witty wisecracks and thoughtful responses.

Anyway, here’s my beef. Call me blind, but it seems to me the only relationships between men and women that I am seeing (at least the ones that are lasting) are the ones where the woman is very sweet, saintly, subservient, submissive, not strong-willed, sassy, independent, self-assured. It’s like for the long haul the smart, funny, sweet, self-confident guys don’t want a confident, sassy woman who might disagree with them or have her own life, one who might question their authority or want to call the shots some of the time.

I think of myself as a decent person (although still smarting from being dumped by one of those so called nice guys about five months ago who ditched me for a needy subservient type). I lead an active life, I’m friendly and willing to help out. I’m also independent, stubborn at times, and am not afraid to do things for myself if necessary. I would like to find a guy who can handle that, but am also not looking for an overly macho type. Am I asking the impossible? It seems I scare away the guys who possess qualities that I am looking for or only get the leechy ones who have no life of their own and like to latch on to mine. Any advice would be appreciated.

– Sassy and Single

Dear Sassy,

Thank YOU. Anyway, I know it’s not helpful just to make a counterpoint, but let me just say for the record that some of my best friends are strong-willed, sassy, independent, self-assured women who are marrying smart, funny, sweet, self-confident guys — next month, in fact. And I’m not even talking about Susan Sarandon. Just so you know.

Listen, though, BG knows exactly what you’re talking about. I mean, try being a female hockey player. At the first level, many guys are like, “Wow, that’s really cool, that must be really exciting and empowering, Title IX, yada yada yada…so, do you ladies FIGHT?” (or, alternatively, “Those shoulder pads, elbow pads, pants, socks, shin pads, skates, helmet, and stick sure would look good on my floor!”). But when it comes to the long haul, there’s this sense of “She plays hockey … what does she need me for?” And often, those who are willing to stick around are those who need me … to walk them home.

But there is something to this “need” thing. And it’s not necessarily a gender thing. In our partnerships, we want to feel that we can take care of each other. Not because either party needs it in an icky needy way, but because each allows and welcomes it. That’s what partnerships are for. Listen, Sassy, you don’t want a guy who fully fully takes care of himself any less than you want a guy who can’t. Whoever you’re dating goddamn well better need you from time to time, am I right? And a guy wants to feel the same way.

So go ahead, be as sassy as ever; don’t change. Don’t get too bent out of shape about this situation — now that I’ve shown you how normal and human it is — or your sassiness will come across not as your bad self, but as Attitude. As in, “I’M SASSY AND STRONG-WILLED! TAKE ME OR LEAVE ME, YOU PUNY BASTARDS! GO AHEAD, PROVE MY HYPOTHESIS!” It’s a matter of tone, of degree, of spin. Ultimately, you will find someone with whom you naturally strike the right push-and-pull, duet-and-solo balance for both of you.

Love,
Breakup Girl

P.S. Same shout goes out to The Intimidator.


Strict Standards: Non-static method GDSRDBCache::get_comments() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/code/class.php on line 1962

8 Comments »

  1. In the season finale of Mad Men, everybody was in an uproar because Don chose Meghan over Faye. I totally got it. Meghan was completely at ease in her own skin, whereas Faye was always justifying her choices and over-asserting her strength and intelligence. Which made her come off as difficult and insecure.

    Men aren’t intimidated by strong, funny, independent women. They’re turned off by women who feel like they have something to prove. So often what we think is “sassy” comes off sarcastic and abrasive. And there’s a difference ebetween being smart and being a smartypants. I envy the women who know how to pull this off with such finesse. It’s something I struggle with.

    I don’t think it’s so much about conveying a sense of need or vulernability. It’s about being yourself and letting a guy be himself.

    Comment by AndThatsWhyYoureSingle — October 29, 2010 @ 12:10 pm

  2. I think that’s a really smart (as opposed to “smartypants”!) distinction. I mean, women *are* more penalized for being “pushy” etc. than men, but I wonder if that’s more true to (e.g.) the workplace than it is in dating. Women don’t so much love abrasive/smartypants/etc. men, either. I like your take on the Man Men ending, too…
    Thanks for commenting! Please keep visiting!

    Comment by BG — October 29, 2010 @ 12:38 pm

  3. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Breakup Girl, Moxieinthecity. Moxieinthecity said: YEEEESSSS!!! @breakup_girl Breakup Girl » Do guys REALLY want to be with strong women? http://bit.ly/aW4ZOR (YES) #dating [...]

    Pingback by Tweets that mention Breakup Girl » Sassy and lonely -- Topsy.com — October 29, 2010 @ 12:39 pm

  4. I really think the problem is that women act in a way that they perceive men to act, but not necessarily how men actually behave. For example, they think being strong means being aggressive, brash and pushy. Women adapt what they ~think~ are acceptable male characteristics. But they aren’t acceptable, not at all, not from men or women.

    Comment by AndThatsWhyYoureSingle — October 29, 2010 @ 1:28 pm

  5. I’ve previously noted that people tend to call themselves “honest” or “direct” when other people would call them “rude.” So I was curious what “sassy” meant.

    Checking the dictionary
    Def’n of sassy: saucy
    Def’n of saucy: impertinent
    Def’n of impertinent: intrusive or presumptuous, as persons or their actions

    Not very attractive.

    Smart is attractive. Confident is attractive. I’m not interested in dating someone who disagrees with me regularly, nor someone who is too stubborn to compromise. Men are looking for a girlfriend who is easy to be around, not an opponent.

    Comment by Karl R — October 29, 2010 @ 4:56 pm

  6. Something to consider.

    I think, generally speaking, responcible and dependable males like to feel needed. Perhaps this should be considered. That doesn’t make the female needy or clingy. Bottom line, in any relationship each persons needs and desires should be communicated, in a mature non-theratening manner, and whenever possible they should be met.

    Replying to AndThatsWhyYoureSingle: I know for a fact I do NOT want to date a female that behaves like a male. I’m not interested in her being “aggressive, brash and pushy”. There are many ways to get what you need and want without being like that. Some light teasing and playfull banter is great but, people need to be aware of their partners reactions and be adaptive.

    Comment by Kelly (male) — October 29, 2010 @ 5:18 pm

  7. Replying and agreeing with Karl: Heres a quote, I found this on the internet somewhere.

    Anyone who believes that self-expression is an excuse for delivering insults is a menace to society

    Yes, truth is a virtue. But when it conflicts with other virtues, it doesn’t always win.
    Ask the Anne Frank question — whether a moral person who is asked her whereabouts by Nazi SS officers is obliged to reply, “She’s up there, in the attic.”

    *** Truth and self-expression is not good excuse for delivering insults. ***

    Comment by Kelly (male) — October 29, 2010 @ 5:22 pm

  8. [...] asked/answered this question before — for background and review, read Sassy’s letter and response — but here’s some [...]

    Pingback by Breakup Girl » Defamation of Independence — April 11, 2011 @ 8:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

**Mean or otherwise out-of-line comments will be deleted. That’s just how we roll.


Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class sk2_plugin in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/SK2/sk2_plugin_class.php on line 45

Strict Standards: Declaration of sk2_captcha_plugin::output_plugin_UI() should be compatible with sk2_plugin::output_plugin_UI($output_dls = true) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/SK2/sk2_plugins/sk2_captcha_plugin.php on line 70

Strict Standards: Declaration of sk2_pjw_simpledigest::output_plugin_UI() should be compatible with sk2_plugin::output_plugin_UI($output_dls = true) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/SK2/sk2_plugins/sk2_pjw_daily_digest_plugin.php on line 277

Strict Standards: Declaration of sk2_rbl_plugin::treat_this() should be compatible with sk2_plugin::treat_this(&$cmt_object) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/SK2/sk2_plugins/sk2_rbl_plugin.php on line 342

Strict Standards: Declaration of sk2_referrer_check_plugin::output_plugin_UI() should be compatible with sk2_plugin::output_plugin_UI($output_dls = true) in /home/cdkalb/breakupgirl.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/SK2/sk2_plugins/sk2_referrer_check_plugin.php on line 78
[breakupgirl.net]

blog | advice | comics | animation | goodies | to do | archive | about us

Breakup Girl created by Lynn Harris & Chris Kalb
© 2008 Just Friends Productions, Inc.
| privacy policy
Cool Aid!

Important Breakup Girl Maxim:
Breakup Girl Sez

MORE COMICS...

Powered by WordPress